VCU94MCV98
Elite Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2011
- Posts
- 2,360
- Likes
- 7,645
I thought our lack of outside shooting allowed them to pack the lane? Dammit, I can never remember which way it goes.I think our lack of a consistent inside scoring threat allowed our opponents to keep pressure on our perimeter players. Also, it looked to me like we sacrificed offensive rebounds to get our defense back and set up quickly to stop transition baskets.
Exactly. Offense isn’t top 200. Three point shooting is 3rd in the A10 with 4 guys that are 35% or better. We only average 16 threes a game. But Mike knows what he’s doing in the offensive end and we shouldn’t question the strategy. I think he’s a great defensive coach… better than Shaka or Wade and on the same level as Tony Bennett. His offensive strategy needs to be modernized.Our offense wasn't in the top 200 in kenpom lmao. I don't wanna hear how that was planned/is a good strategy/trust the coaches.
We cut the turnovers in half and I bet it's top 100.Our offense wasn't in the top 200 in kenpom lmao. I don't wanna hear how that was planned/is a good strategy/trust the coaches.
Our offense wasn't in the top 200 in kenpom lmao. I don't wanna hear how that was planned/is a good strategy/trust the coaches.
It got a ton better when Ace came back and Curry used the magic basketball from Space Jam to absorb other basketball talents and played out of his mind for 3 weeks or so.It was 359th at one point. I don’t know how much it improved tbh.
Dunno about top 100 but sniffing it for sure. I know they said it was being worked on and all that but still so many unforced turnovers…We cut the turnovers in half and I bet it's top 100.
Or maybe they are third in conference because they stopped taking bad threes? Of course then you game plan for more.If they’re shooting 3rd best in the conference on 3s, then they absolutely need to be taking more 3s.