CarNer0
Elite Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Posts
- 615
- Likes
- 1,113
(Sorry to post a kind of unrelated topic in the MBB forum, but the other forums are a bit dead so I thought it would get more eyeballs here...)
Is there anyone here with some inside knowledge on the production aspects of our home-cooked ESPN+ broadcast? I don't watch a lot of other schools' productions, but ours leaves a bit to be desired and I'm just curious why. It's been literally years of this. They've fixed some extremely glaring mistakes over the years but it feels like a game of whack-a-mole with other stuff popping up.
Last night, for instance:
Is there anyone here with some inside knowledge on the production aspects of our home-cooked ESPN+ broadcast? I don't watch a lot of other schools' productions, but ours leaves a bit to be desired and I'm just curious why. It's been literally years of this. They've fixed some extremely glaring mistakes over the years but it feels like a game of whack-a-mole with other stuff popping up.
Last night, for instance:
- Every replay, if there was one, seemed to play at ~10fps. It was like watching stop motion basketball.
- There were (as always) several random smash cuts to the under-basket cameras at inappropriate times showing stuff like the player's shoes or, a favorite of mine from last night, a dramatic crash zoom of the opposite basket after we scored. I will say that these shots do give me a hearty laugh, which was necessary at times during the game last night, but overall I'd rather not hear Yakety sax in my head while I'm watching VCU basketball lol.
- It seems like we are using outdated equipment, which I understand, we don't have a ton of money to upgrade..I also don't know how much ESPN+ factors into the resolution of the broadcast, so I won't go too crazy about that. For some reason though, the sideline camera they use for tighter shots almost seems to have an ND filter or something on it though.. it's maybe 2 stops underexposed and idk why. The difference in exposure is jarring from one shot to the next and it looks muddy.
- The audio is improved from years past (no more ridiculous feedback or buzzing), but the mix is way off. Why are they playing the commentary audio from the rear audio channel and not the center? It's weird as heck. Ed Nixon is whispering in my ear.