2012Ram
Top Member
- Feb 28, 2013
- 16,218
- 47,470
There will be those that don't like this and will point to a number of examples why its not good and then there will be those like me that like it for a number of reasons.
I think it will be a double-edged sword for us, in that we will probably get some transfer players that will help us immediately and probably lose some players to transfer that will hurt us immediately.There will be those that don't like this and will point to a number of examples why its not good and then there will be those like me that like it for a number of reasons.
Agreed, I love it for the players. We could certainly loose some players but if a player doesn't want to be somewhere, are you going to get their best?I think it will be a double-edged sword for us, in that we will probably get some transfer players that will help us immediately and probably lose some players to transfer that will hurt us immediately.
I like it for the players though.
I think it will be a double-edged sword for us, in that we will probably get some transfer players that will help us immediately and probably lose some players to transfer that will hurt us immediately.
I like it for the players though.
I haven't heard it described that way, but that would change the dynamics for sure. Also not sure it would be favorable to the kids. One free move and then no ability to transfer?I am not sure of the exact details of this new proposal but IIRC wasnt this move so that they could eliminate grad transfers and waivers altogther?
If so, then I would think it could deincentivize transfers altogether because if you transfer, you are stuck at that school like it or not.
I am not sure of the exact details of this new proposal but IIRC wasnt this move so that they could eliminate grad transfers and waivers altogther?
If so, then I would think it could deincentivize transfers altogether because if you transfer, you are stuck at that school like it or not.