I wouldn't dare post this publicly but here is my take. Most here are so happy we are a BB only school because they are afraid FB would ruin everything but my take is not having FB is hurting our BB program now that we have gotten to this level. We are at a dead end without FB. Where are we gonna go? A small step up to the Big East is it. And down the road the P5s are probably gonna leave the NCAA and we will be whats equivalent to FCS in FB. We are gonna keep struggling to sign 4 stars and hardly ever a 5 star. A NC is not gonna happen that way. Making the NCAAs every year is top 50. I doubt we ever see a FF again. They better get used to it because we are stalled and I dont see a way out now. We should have started it in the 70s. Am I nuts or what?
Here's the thing..... if FB had been started back in the 70's or w/e before VCU became so huge & before Basketball was the big ticket in town... then yeah conceivably we could have a successful basketball & Football program.... also because back then..... VCU hadn't taken over pretty much all of Downtown, The Redskins training camp in Richmond was not even thought of yet, and who knows what else was not here yet in Richmond back in those days (I'll leave it for the long time Richmonders to fill in the gaps there).
But there's several issues.....
1. Where would we play? There's only 2 places we could theoretically play.... both would prob need a make over if we were to try & use it for football.... SportsBacker & City Stadium.
2. Who's gonna pay for it? Where's the money going to come from?..... Is all our money that we are donating to the RAF gonna go to it.... and if so are we going to have to increase our giving just to keep our basketball season tickets? Bad enough donation levels are steadily going up as it is now.
3. If we add football.... it means we either have to add a couple more Women's sports to make up the difference in number of scholarships.... or we have to take away scholarships from the current men's teams.... So which mens teams do we wanna get rid of it? Obviously not basketball. Baseball? Soccer? T&F? Or what sports do we wanna add for the women? Swimming? Softball (which would require another field being built).
As far as where we go in terms of conferences.... ultimately that should be the least of our concern right now.... really our concern should be keeping a fricking coach longer than 3-4 years. In our programs 49 year history (not counting this coming season yet)... we've had 12 coaches.... and only 4 of them have stayed longer than 4 years (Shaka, Smith, Barnett, Noe).... and only 1 of them has stayed longer than 6 years (Smith).....
You look at Gonzaga... they're not a power 5 school, they don't have football either, yet look at how successful they are? Since 1968 when our program was created... they've had a total of 7 coaches (6 different coaches... one was coach in 2 different stints)... and only Dan Monson's tenure was fewer than 4 years.
Mark Few... the current coach has been there since 1999. He finished either 1st or 2nd in the West Coast Conference every single year. He's made the NCAA Tourney every year. And here's a breakdown of how his team has done
NCAA Tourneys: 18 out of 18 seasons
Round of 32: 15
Sweet 16: 7
Elite 8's: 2
Final Four: 1
Champ. Game: 1
That's pretty darn impressive for a non power 5 school.... and the reason they are so successful is Stability.
Sure they don't have a National Championship in that resume... but heck, there's a lot of power 5 schools who don't sniff a national championships in a lot of sports.
I'm Perfectly fine not having football.