I was just looking at the collgeinsider.com poll and we have GMU and VCU 3/4 respectively with ODU 14, and Drexel in the 20's. Also, all four are in the top 54 of RPI.
GMU has come on strong of late, VCU has been stay throughout the year, and ODU has had big wins out of conference and losses within the conference.
Given VCU did whip UCLA and other OOC teams, ODU's strong OOC against the likes of Richmond, Clemson, and others, plus Drexel's winning at Louisville, why cant we as a league assert that we make a compelling argument for 3 bids, 2 at large ant the 1 tourney championship?
Let's say that we win 2 of the big 3 bracket busters as well? Why do we have to be a 1 possible 2 bid league?
It doesn't make sense. Does anyone agree, disagree?
I understand the power 6 bias and all that but just looking at the numbers shouldnt the CAA be in the running for 2 solid with a possible 3 bids?
Shouldn't the commish's office be putting out the word?
Thoughts?
GMU has come on strong of late, VCU has been stay throughout the year, and ODU has had big wins out of conference and losses within the conference.
Given VCU did whip UCLA and other OOC teams, ODU's strong OOC against the likes of Richmond, Clemson, and others, plus Drexel's winning at Louisville, why cant we as a league assert that we make a compelling argument for 3 bids, 2 at large ant the 1 tourney championship?
Let's say that we win 2 of the big 3 bracket busters as well? Why do we have to be a 1 possible 2 bid league?
It doesn't make sense. Does anyone agree, disagree?
I understand the power 6 bias and all that but just looking at the numbers shouldnt the CAA be in the running for 2 solid with a possible 3 bids?
Shouldn't the commish's office be putting out the word?
Thoughts?