Hey people, I'm obviously new on here, so just wanted to welcome myself and put in my two cents.
Now I know larry's a big guy and big guys tend towards foul trouble, but is it just me or does anyone else think that having him play a little less aggressive D and being able to get more playing time would be worth allowing the several points our opposition makes? or at least just holding back until the clutch.
it's unfortunate that kirill weren't a tad more coordinated and a bit more aware on D, but I'd personally feel more comfortable having #1 in there more than his average 25 minutes, even if it means risking a few more FGs a game. easier said than done though, I suppose. I've just been bummed out with the amount of fouling going on, off and on, this season (and not just with larry, although I think it effects his/our game the most).
oh and i might add that every game we've lost this season larry has either fouled out or had 4 fouls. be it that he fouled out because of the game intensity or otherwise, I don't believe this is just a coincidence.
Now I know larry's a big guy and big guys tend towards foul trouble, but is it just me or does anyone else think that having him play a little less aggressive D and being able to get more playing time would be worth allowing the several points our opposition makes? or at least just holding back until the clutch.
it's unfortunate that kirill weren't a tad more coordinated and a bit more aware on D, but I'd personally feel more comfortable having #1 in there more than his average 25 minutes, even if it means risking a few more FGs a game. easier said than done though, I suppose. I've just been bummed out with the amount of fouling going on, off and on, this season (and not just with larry, although I think it effects his/our game the most).
oh and i might add that every game we've lost this season larry has either fouled out or had 4 fouls. be it that he fouled out because of the game intensity or otherwise, I don't believe this is just a coincidence.