This is more about getting nice press than anything else. Any ESPN mentions are welcome.

Recruiting is hit-or-miss but we have had some highly-touted guys pan out very nicely for us like Joey Rodriguez and Brad Burgess most recently and obviously some of our lesser touted guys are in/going to the NBA in Larry and Eric. Our recruiting has been pretty darn good. There aren't many BCS team that can boast consecutive first-round NBA draft picks. It's all about what your metrics for success are. If you ask a high school recruit and ask them who has been most successful recruiting out of the CAA schools, us having two consecutive NBA first-rounders will always push us over the top, regardless of whether the perception is right or wrong.
Taylor has a good system, but let's not forget you guys were in the CBI and CIT the 2 years before this. One downside to his style is a lot of times you have to build up guys with a lower skill level but who have the potential to grow into great players. ie. Hassell was as a raw as sushi coming in and Bazemore couldn't dribble the ball without having it go off his foot. It took time, but once they grew and got through ODU's redshirt heavy program (which allowed them more experience and time to bulk up) you had a heck of a team this year that ended up winning a NCAA tournament game. Now if Taylor can parlay that success into getting players that can play earlier, you may not have to worry about up and down cycles like the last 4 years for ODU (NCAA at-large, CBI, CIT, NCAA automatic). That is very possible since ODU is probably more appealing than ever after winning the NCAA game. It's up to Blaine to capitalize on it. For example, after next year, you graduate most of your impact players (Finney, James, Hassell, Carter) and you'll be young. If you can get college-ready prospects that can contribute early, you might not miss a beat. The way Taylor recruits though, you'll probably take a step back. ODU will never fall far back since the CAA sucks in general and you should always be a top 4 program, but you won't be really at the top either.
That's not really much different than VCU or Mason etc. since they have up and down cycles as well. Getting highly-touted guys that scouts and coaches think are really good never hurts though. There are just too many metrics that you can't really evaluate until the player hits the floor (ie. how the player meshes with teammates, acclimating to the speed and strength of D1 athletes, homesickness etc.). Mason's class is the poster-child for how little rankings mean. They had the top non-BCS class last year and their lowest ranked recruit (literally) was their best player. They had like a 6 or 7 member class. While they are all freshmen and a number of them could really be great/good players. Mason has arguably had the top recruiting on paper in the conference and done nothing with it. Absolutely nothing. Their lone NCAA appearance after '06 was only because ODU/VCU got knocked off and they were in (by far) the easier bracket going against an exhausted Tribe team playing their 4th game in as many days. They then proceeded to get blown out by a ridiculous margin on national television while the team that won the regular season by 3 games (that would be us) was relegated to the NIT. I don't know any team that has done less with the amount of advantages they have recruiting with a Final Four.
Our guys are pretty highly-touted, but as I said before, the odds are that 1-2 of them could be all-conference players, 1-2 maybe good role players, and 1 will probably never make an impact or transfer for more playing time. This is the way recruiting usually goes. The rankings are just nice for off-season banter and energizing a fanbase.