- Joined
- May 6, 2009
- Posts
- 40
- Likes
- 5
In 7 games against the top of the CAA (Northeastern, Mason, ODU, Drexel, and W&M), here are the numbers for the top 7 guys in minutes for VCU.
*Skeen- 8/29 FG (27%), 37 pts (6.1ppg), 29 rebs (4.8rpg), 1/6 3PT (16%), 18/26 FT (69%)
Rozzell- 18/39 FG (46%), 49 pts (7ppg), 15 rebs (2.1rpg), 9/24 3PT (37%), 9 ast (1.2apg), 6 TOs, 7 stl
Sanders- 44/92 FG (47%), 108 pts (15.4ppg), 62 rebs (8.8rpg), 13 blks (1.8 bpg), 21 fouls (3 per), 20/31 FT (65%)
Rodriguez- 30/73 FG (41%), 88 pts (12.5ppg), 12/33 3PT (36%), 46 ast (6.5 apg), 16 TOs (2.2 per), 13 stl (1.8spg)
Nixon- 20/37 FG (54%), 58 pts (8.2ppg), 9/14 3PT (64%), 9/12 FT (75%)
Gwynn- 12/24 FG (50%), 31 pts (4.4ppg), 20 rebs (2.8rpg), 5/11 FT (45%)
Burgess- 23/43 FG (53%), 70 pts (10ppg), 7/23 3PT (30%), 31 rebs (4.4rpg), 17/18 FT (94%)
*Skeen's numbers are adjusted for him not playing in the first W&M game.
The Rams are 2-5 against these opponents and because of the small sample size some of the numbers are a little skewed. For example, Burgess' huge game against Drexel helped his numbers a lot. Without the Drexel game, he only averages 6.6ppg. The Mason game helped Rodriguez a lot (27% from 3 w/o it) as did the two W&M games for Rozzell. Excluding W&M, Rozzell is 3/16 (18%) from 3. Skeen has by far struggled the most in these key games.
Looking at the numbers, Sanders (the guy who gets blamed a lot for losses) is the only consistent performer against the key opponents. And to a lesser extent, Nixon, who's numbers would be better if he did not have that cameo in the Drexel game.
Just some numbers for those interested. Not much else to do when snowed in. Hopefully these numbers shed some light on the struggles of VCU against the CAA's top teams.
*Skeen- 8/29 FG (27%), 37 pts (6.1ppg), 29 rebs (4.8rpg), 1/6 3PT (16%), 18/26 FT (69%)
Rozzell- 18/39 FG (46%), 49 pts (7ppg), 15 rebs (2.1rpg), 9/24 3PT (37%), 9 ast (1.2apg), 6 TOs, 7 stl
Sanders- 44/92 FG (47%), 108 pts (15.4ppg), 62 rebs (8.8rpg), 13 blks (1.8 bpg), 21 fouls (3 per), 20/31 FT (65%)
Rodriguez- 30/73 FG (41%), 88 pts (12.5ppg), 12/33 3PT (36%), 46 ast (6.5 apg), 16 TOs (2.2 per), 13 stl (1.8spg)
Nixon- 20/37 FG (54%), 58 pts (8.2ppg), 9/14 3PT (64%), 9/12 FT (75%)
Gwynn- 12/24 FG (50%), 31 pts (4.4ppg), 20 rebs (2.8rpg), 5/11 FT (45%)
Burgess- 23/43 FG (53%), 70 pts (10ppg), 7/23 3PT (30%), 31 rebs (4.4rpg), 17/18 FT (94%)
*Skeen's numbers are adjusted for him not playing in the first W&M game.
The Rams are 2-5 against these opponents and because of the small sample size some of the numbers are a little skewed. For example, Burgess' huge game against Drexel helped his numbers a lot. Without the Drexel game, he only averages 6.6ppg. The Mason game helped Rodriguez a lot (27% from 3 w/o it) as did the two W&M games for Rozzell. Excluding W&M, Rozzell is 3/16 (18%) from 3. Skeen has by far struggled the most in these key games.
Looking at the numbers, Sanders (the guy who gets blamed a lot for losses) is the only consistent performer against the key opponents. And to a lesser extent, Nixon, who's numbers would be better if he did not have that cameo in the Drexel game.
Just some numbers for those interested. Not much else to do when snowed in. Hopefully these numbers shed some light on the struggles of VCU against the CAA's top teams.