The Official Beat the Elizabeth City State Vikings in the Stu on Black & Gold Friday Thread

For those who are relentlessly complaining about it, the following A10 schools have non-D1 regular season opponents:

Dayton
VCU
Loyola Chicago
George Mason
Rhode Island
St. Bonaventure
Davidson
Saint Louis
GW
UMass
Richmond (they play *2* non-D1 opponents)
Fordham
La Salle
Duquesne

That is, all of them except St. Joe's. Now shut up about it.
 
For those who are relentlessly complaining about it, the following A10 schools have non-D1 regular season opponents:

Dayton
VCU
Loyola Chicago
George Mason
Rhode Island
St. Bonaventure
Davidson
Saint Louis
GW
UMass
Richmond (they play *2* non-D1 opponents)
Fordham
La Salle
Duquesne

That is, all of them except St. Joe's. Now shut up about it.
For those who are parents, does this line sound familiar: "Would you jump off the bridge just because Johnny did it?"
 
For those who are parents, does this line sound familiar: "Would you jump off the bridge just because Johnny did it?"
They discussed this on the radio. They talked about having a D1 program where we are supposed to win big but only win by 3-4 and how it would hurt us come selection sunday as far as NET. Whereas a mid OOC game against a DII would allow us to work on things, try out new things, get guys some run and a win or loss by small or large margin wouldn't have an impact on selection sunday and it would give us a chance to rework things we may need to work on.
That was their reasoning for playing a DII vs a weaker DI.
 
They discussed this on the radio. They talked about having a D1 program where we are supposed to win big but only win by 3-4 and how it would hurt us come selection sunday as far as NET. Whereas a mid OOC game against a DII would allow us to work on things, try out new things, get guys some run and a win or loss by small or large margin wouldn't have an impact on selection sunday and it would give us a chance to rework things we may need to work on.
That was their reasoning for playing a DII vs a weaker DI.
And it's not like we played a bunch of super weak opponents before the stronger ones, like a certain Dan Hurley-coached team just did.
 
They discussed this on the radio. They talked about having a D1 program where we are supposed to win big but only win by 3-4 and how it would hurt us come selection sunday as far as NET. Whereas a mid OOC game against a DII would allow us to work on things, try out new things, get guys some run and a win or loss by small or large margin wouldn't have an impact on selection sunday and it would give us a chance to rework things we may need to work on.
That was their reasoning for playing a DII vs a weaker DI.
I heard it but I don't buy it.
 
They discussed this on the radio. They talked about having a D1 program where we are supposed to win big but only win by 3-4 and how it would hurt us come selection sunday as far as NET. Whereas a mid OOC game against a DII would allow us to work on things, try out new things, get guys some run and a win or loss by small or large margin wouldn't have an impact on selection sunday and it would give us a chance to rework things we may need to work on.
That was their reasoning for playing a DII vs a weaker DI.
well if that is the case why did we play all the other weak D1 teams in the OOC.
 
They discussed this on the radio. They talked about having a D1 program where we are supposed to win big but only win by 3-4 and how it would hurt us come selection sunday as far as NET. Whereas a mid OOC game against a DII would allow us to work on things, try out new things, get guys some run and a win or loss by small or large margin wouldn't have an impact on selection sunday and it would give us a chance to rework things we may need to work on.
That was their reasoning for playing a DII vs a weaker DI.
And of course, scheduling a quality D1 opponent is off the table?

So does that theory not apply to the other six weaker D1 teams on our home schedule too?
 
Back
Top