Who Needs The Bubble When You’re A10 Champions?

CrozetRam said:
At 19-14 is Baylor on the bubble or considered a lock?
Click to expand...
They're a lock.

Right now even Joe Lunardi is saying VCU should be safely in the tournament, and we're in all 105 of the entries on Bracket Matrix (and not all of them have us as the AQ). The bubble appears to be limited to Indiana, Xavier, and Boise State.
 
Half-baked Mcbride said:
I do, Jamarii Thomas was a Ram until he got a bigger bag of money from the Gamecocks.

It was ANOTHER reminder of what we are...we're a Mid....a good/great Mid, but a Mid nonetheless.

Sure, it worked out....but it hurt in early May '24....I'm kinda glad he had a sh#t season in the SEC basement
Click to expand...
I think it's not limited to MM. With only limited exceptions, the guy with the biggest bag wins the sweepstakes.
 
WillWeaverRVA said:
They're a lock.

Right now even Joe Lunardi is saying VCU should be safely in the tournament, and we're in all 105 of the entries on Bracket Matrix (and not all of them have us as the AQ). The bubble appears to be limited to Indiana, Xavier, and Boise State.
Click to expand...
Yeah, they're a lock with 5 quad 1 wins. Of course, they have 12 quad 1 losses.
 
VCU is 18-2 in the last 20 games after a less than ideal start of the season.

11th seed for a 28-6 team will be interesting.
 
I hate to say it, but is it just me, or was Jon Rothstein precisely correct based off the seed rankings? It sucks to say, but it seems like he was just telling us what the committee was going to do. Now maybe he supports the committee and if so I have a problem with him but the bigger issue is the committee.

As absolutely sickening as it is to consider, there appears to now be verifiable proof that if we lost seven games this year, we would have been excluded from the NCAA Tournament. Truly insane and sickening.
 
vcusaint said:
I hate to say it, but is it just me, or was Jon Rothstein precisely correct based off the seed rankings? It sucks to say, but it seems like he was just telling us what the committee was going to do. Now maybe he supports the committee and if so I have a problem with him but the bigger issue is the committee.

As absolutely sickening as it is to consider, there appears to now be verifiable proof that if we lost seven games this year, we would have been excluded from the NCAA Tournament. Truly insane and sickening.
Click to expand...
Counter point : beat New Mexico or don’t lose to seton hall, rest of the season goes as it did, I think we are relatively comfortable on the right side of the bubble.

Other point : DONT MATTER WE DANCIN!! LOCK THIS THREAD DOWN BOYS
 
LazyStegosaurus said:
Counter point : beat New Mexico or don’t lose to seton hall, rest of the season goes as it did, I think we are relatively comfortable on the right side of the bubble.

Other point : DONT MATTER WE DANCIN!! LOCK THIS THREAD DOWN BOYS
Click to expand...
Good points all around! Cheers lads and ladies!
 
The power conference walled garden approach needs to be reined in for the overall health of the sport. If you hoard so many structural advantages, you shouldn't also then be able to claim hardship because it's difficult to play against others with whom you share those advantages.
 
artRAMinMN said:
The power conference walled garden approach needs to be reined in for the overall health of the sport. If you hoard so many structural advantages, you shouldn't also then be able to claim hardship because it's difficult to play against others with whom you share those advantages.
Click to expand...

An argument that goes far beyond sports.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top