Who would you start?

Natty

Co-Founder
Elite Member
Insider
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
6,422
Likes
16,752
Got a good little sample of games to go off of, who would you start?
 
The 2010 lineup of Joey, Brandon, Brad, Jaime, Larry. It's our best offensive lineup, and can work well on defense with time to gel. I love having TJ and Ed to come off as instant spark to the defense as well, especially when you want to turn the press up a notch.
 
Sanders
Skeen
Burgess
Nixon
Rodriguez
 
Pavarotti said:
The 2010 lineup of Joey, Brandon, Brad, Jaime, Larry. It's our best offensive lineup, and can work well on defense with time to gel. I love having TJ and Ed to come off as instant spark to the defense as well, especially when you want to turn the press up a notch.


This, This, and oh yeah, THIS!
 
VCU4LIFE said:
Pavarotti said:
The 2010 lineup of Joey, Brandon, Brad, Jaime, Larry. It's our best offensive lineup, and can work well on defense with time to gel. I love having TJ and Ed to come off as instant spark to the defense as well, especially when you want to turn the press up a notch.


This, This, and oh yeah, THIS!

2nd time today where you don't have an original thought but jump on Pav's little red wagon, how cute!
 
Joey
Brandon
Brad
TJ - hes been having a great year, no need to take his starting spot for Skeen just yet
Larry
 
L72boy said:
VCU4LIFE said:
Pavarotti said:
The 2010 lineup of Joey, Brandon, Brad, Jaime, Larry. It's our best offensive lineup, and can work well on defense with time to gel. I love having TJ and Ed to come off as instant spark to the defense as well, especially when you want to turn the press up a notch.


This, This, and oh yeah, THIS!

2nd time today where you don't have an original thought but jump on Pav's little red wagon, how cute!


Yeah, I guess I can give you credit for the starting Saintil idea as being original..... :?
 
Emit Remmus said:
Joey
Brandon
Brad
TJ - hes been having a great year, no need to take his starting spot for Skeen just yet
Larry


I would agree with you here, but do think that we need to find more minutes/touches for Jamie!
 
This, This, and oh yeah, THIS![/quote]

2nd time today where you don't have an original thought but jump on Pav's little red wagon, how cute![/quote]


Yeah, I guess I can give you credit for the starting Saintil idea as being original..... :?[/quote]

:lol:

The only reason for starting Saintil people is for his physical play. He is a better athlete than KP.
 
VCU4LIFE said:
Why does he deserve to start over Jamie Skeen?!?

Seems that Saintil and Sanders feed off each others energy. KP and Skeen compliment each other game wise.
When Larry starts slow he just isn't into the game and Saintil seems to boost him up. I like having a big like Skeen come off the bench with KP and Theus, Nixon and TJ. Just the coach in me.
 
1 - Joey
2 - ? (This is my only question mark. Brandon's offense would be great here, but Nixon's become such an amazing defender)
3 - Brad (Great offense and defense. Hard to believe he's just a Sophomore.)
4 - Skeen (Best offense we have at the 4 and very good rebounder. Teams can't guard him without fouling.)
5 - Larry (We have to stick with our guy. He'll get out of this rut)

Where's the fire, the swagger, and the will to win? Someone on this team needs to come out and physically show it. VCU doesn't play soft.
 
Brandon's defense has been great this year. While Ed is clearly our best on the ball defender, Brandon is not that far behind. He's second on the team in steals behind Joey, and is generally one of the first to dive all over the court deflecting passes.

Larry's exagerated "rut" would be a welcome streak of excellence for most players.
 
Back
Top