skramnewton
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2023
- Posts
- 197
- Likes
- 316
It's hard to visualize the play without a video but here goes lol but based on what you laid out it would depend on if the defender was the primary or secondary defender ("Channeling O to his teammates" makes me think primary). So in that case, their feet don't have to be set. Once you've established LGP (Assuming in your scenario he did) you can move laterally, backwards or obliquely and still maintain LGP. Based on that, it would be a charge.so imagine O with the ball headed to the rim, which is guarded by 2 bigs. D is giving ground in front of O, feet not set. O sees he can't get to the rim and his outside shot is as good as mine (nonexistent) so he just accelerates into D specifically intent on creating the contact. D is not in feet-set position because he's channeling O to his teammates, but is run over by O who has no other play.
Block or charge?
Like Heel said, you can't judge intent. If intent mattered there wouldn't be hardly any fouls because 95% of the time players aren't trying to foul lolIt’s dangerous for referees to start judging intent. I don’t think that’s something we want to introduce to calling games.
What you describe sounds like it could be a non-call. But if there is any question and a call has to be made, then IMO the tie should go to the offense.
Heel, it could be a no call but we would need video. Since he said "run over" I'm assuming it was significant enough contact for there to be a whistle though. That being said, a "tie" goes against whoever violated first lol Defender loses LGP and there's illegal contact: Block. Defender maintains LGP and offensive player goes through defender (i.e. illegal contact) : Charge.
Only "tie" is a held ball